How the Future of Sex Dolls Should Develop
Sex doll technology is the result of modern technological development and production conditions, they believe that sex dolls are the product of patriarchal society, so sex dolls are a product of social misogyny.These media often use the domino theory that we have to stop a thing before it gets out of hand. The possibilities and threats of technological developments are clearly highlighted. They argue that such new technologies dehumanize women by exploiting their bodies. thereby defending slavery.Many writers exclude one subject in their critiques of sex dolls, agency. Whether this omission is intentional or unintentional, it is an effective way to ignore the positive aspects of modern technology and focus only on the risks. Although sex dolls are defined as the result of negative developments in society, these articles generally convey a feeling that technology should not include the sex industry at all. In discussions about the future, production conditions and advanced technologies are not the only focus. It seems that the human sex industry must remain primitive. As long as technology has an impact on human sexuality, it is wrong.And there are parallels in how society views sex through synthetic but lifelike copies. A dildo or artificial vagina can certainly be classified as a lifelike replica, but at the same time they only exist without a body attached. Since they have no body, there is nothing to project the existence of the soul. This is obviously unfair to sex dolls, people seem to be very accepting of sex toys but very little tolerant of sex dolls. This is also a side idea of the uncanny valley effect.
1. Ways to use social intervention for sex dolls
If sex dolls could be used universally, that would mean that new technologies would be used to reproduce sexual fantasies, making it considered sexually undesirable in our society. New technologies in this way are responsible for sometimes explicit, sometimes implicit threats, and at worst allowing sex dolls to be sexually and/or emotionally used by several people in reality. The only possible exception is where sex dolls function as social interventions. One of the recurring elements is lonely people. In these cases, sex dolls are described as a way to explore sexuality and a "solution" to a relationship that doesn't exist. Using social intervention methods for lonely or defective people may allow them to leave the real predicament and enter the society for normal social interaction. Such a part of people may no longer be obsessed with the pursuit of sex dolls, so as to live a normal social life.
The point is that sex dolls are not for anyone, but first and foremost two subgroups of lonely men: men with intellectual disabilities and older men who have lost a life partner. The depiction of the relationship between the sex doll and the living person suggests that this is not a "real" relationship, but a surrogate, a surrogate that goes beyond expectations. an adult and their sexuality. These cases demonstrate a hierarchy of sexual values. These groups of people were considered abnormal from the start. Social intervention can train people to develop normal empathy. One article involved a doctor specializing in sexual medicine who explained that many of her patients don't seek sex with sex dolls, but need someone to talk to. In the same article, she is also quoted as saying that sex dolls and robots are a symptom of a "pornographic" society, so she is hesitant to use them because human sex is actually a relationship between two people, Rather than something between the organic human being, something that hovers between the definition of a sex toy and the synthetic human being, threatens to erase the relatively stable line between sex toys and humans. This is actually an inherent view of people and cannot deny the value and positive effect of sex dolls on society.
2. Sex dolls may exacerbate lovelessness
Some people think that sex dolls will exacerbate society's escape from difficulties or practical problems. Sex dolls were created to represent all things good. Not only is it nice and rewarding when a child is playing, and when an adult is playing with a doll, something incredible happens. Adult males who refuse to grow up can cause ridicule and fear. To be a man, to be a man, means to let go of childish things. Some psychologists believe that an adult man with a sex doll is rigid and lacks empathy. But is it really so? Young people are expected to leave the boy's room in order to mature and grow and gain their own orderly home and family. The image of the immature boy and his teenage room serves as a productive psychological picture when the writer discusses the sexual attraction of sex dolls and is repeated in some texts discussing men and sex dolls. What many of these critical writers miss in using this image is that they recreate and reinforce hegemonic masculinity, making it real masculinity. Sex dolls may just give these people a psychological comfort with a lot of stress in their lives. So it's not that sex dolls let people escape, but they actually give these defective people a psychological comfort.
An overarching theme that seems to emerge in most articles is whether sex dolls should be understood as part or a consequence of the objectification and oppression of women in society. Words and phrases such as "objectification," "sexualization," and "degeneration" are strongly valued in discourses about sex dolls and men's violence against women. This thread includes a discussion of the female figure in which sex dolls are understood to be the result. The biggest problem in this theme, however, is not the objectification of women themselves, but the impact of men having sex with synthetic women on organic women. In the future, sex dolls will continue to develop and the consciousness of men and women will continue to awaken. The debate on this issue will definitely be resolved. Looking at the development of sex dolls in the long run, as long as sex dolls follow this direction in the future, it will be correct and positive.
